I'm obsessed with experimenting.
My latest obsession? Optimizing my writing process. I've turned myself into a living laboratory, meticulously tracking my writing habits, my mental state, and the quality of my output.
In the past 18 months, I've become a data-driven writer, collecting and analyzing information about my own performance. I've also delved into the science of flow and deep work, using these principles to structure my writing sessions. But perhaps the most fascinating discovery has been uncovering the hidden biases that subtly sabotage my writing.
My Quest for Flow and Deep Work
Flow, that elusive state of effortless concentration, is the holy grail for any writer. It's when words seem to pour onto the page and time melts away. Deep work, on the other hand, is about focused, distraction-free concentration on a cognitively demanding task. Both are essential ingredients for producing high-quality writing.
To achieve flow and deep work, I started experimenting with different techniques. I tried the Pomodoro Technique, timeboxing, and even binaural beats. I tracked my productivity during different times of the day, in different environments, and under different conditions. I discovered that my peak performance occurred in the early mornings, in a quiet room, with a cup of coffee and a blanket by my side.
Unmasking My Hidden Biases
As I delved deeper into my self-experimentation, I started to feel like a detective in a noir film, shining a flickering light into the shadowy corners of my mind. And what did I find lurking there? A whole gang of cognitive biases, each with its own sneaky modus operandi."
Confirmation Bias (The Yes-Man): This bias was like that friend who always agrees with you, even when you're spouting utter nonsense. For example, I was writing an article about the benefits of meditation, and I cherry-picked studies that supported my view while conveniently ignoring any research that suggested otherwise. My argument ended up sounding like a one-sided infomercial.
Anchoring Bias (The Stubborn Mule): Imagine clinging to the first idea you have like it's a life raft in a stormy sea, even if that idea is full of holes and sinking fast. That's anchoring bias in a nutshell. I once spent hours trying to salvage a terrible opening paragraph simply because it was the first thing I wrote. It was like trying to build a castle on quicksand.
Availability Heuristic (The Cliché King): This bias is the reason why every love story seems to involve a 'heart of gold' and every villain has 'eyes like ice.' My writing was becoming a graveyard of clichés, a predictable parade of overused phrases. The sheer number of clichés was enough to make a thesaurus cringe.
Confronting My Biases (The Great Escape)
Acknowledging these biases felt like confronting a group of mischievous gremlins within my mind. Evicting them, however, was a whole other story.
Confirmation Bias Buster: To combat my inner Yes-Man, I started playing devil's advocate with myself. I actively sought out articles and opinions that contradicted my own, even if they made me want to throw my laptop out the window. It was like forcing myself to eat broccoli when all I wanted was pizza, but my writing became much more balanced and nuanced as a result.
Taming the Stubborn Mule: To loosen the grip of anchoring bias, I started brainstorming multiple ideas before committing to anything. It was like having a mental dating app where I swiped left and right on different concepts before settling on 'the one.' I also learned to embrace feedback like a long-lost friend, even if it was critical and made me wince. Although it was painful at times, it helped me identify my blind spots.
Dethroning the Cliché King: To fight the tyranny of clichés, I became best friends with my thesaurus. We went on word-hunting expeditions together, searching for fresh and original ways to express my ideas. I also started reading my work aloud, listening for the rhythm and flow of the sentences. If it sounded like something I'd heard a thousand times before, I had to start over.
The Ongoing Experiment (The Mad Scientist's Lab)
It's important to remember that I'm only one subject in this experiment. What works for me might not work for everyone. That's why it's crucial to combine self-experimentation with external feedback. Getting feedback from other writers, editors, or even beta readers can provide valuable insights and perspectives that I might miss on my own. They can help me identify blind spots, challenge my assumptions, and push me to become a better writer.
The Transformed Writer (Emerging from the Lab)
Looking back, it's amazing to see how far I've come. I've gone from a writer who was often stuck in ruts, clinging to bad ideas and churning out cliché-ridden prose, to a writer who is more mindful, more flexible, and more open to new possibilities. I'm not just a writer anymore; I'm a data-driven writer, a bias-busting, flow-seeking, deep-work-diving writing machine!
And you can be one too! Don't just take my word for it – start your own writing experiment. Track your habits, test different techniques, and challenge your own assumptions. Embrace the power of data and feedback to unlock your full writing potential. Who knows what amazing discoveries await you in your own writing lab?
Key Takeaways:
Embrace self-experimentation: Track your writing habits, experiment with different techniques, and analyze your performance data to identify areas for improvement.
Cultivate flow and deep work: Create an environment conducive to focused concentration and minimize distractions.
Uncover your biases: Be mindful of the subtle ways in which your biases can influence your writing.
Challenge your assumptions: Actively seek out diverse perspectives and question your own beliefs.
Embrace feedback: Use feedback as a tool for growth and self-improvement.
👉 If you enjoy reading this post, feel free to share it with friends! Or feel free to click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Substack
Great thoughts Magdalena! Your journey as a data-driven writer reveals a powerful truth: writing isn’t just about inspiration but about intention - an ongoing dialogue between what we create and how we grow. What strikes me most is how biases, often seen as roadblocks, are actually opportunities to challenge our narratives. They’re like unseen scaffolding; by dismantling them, you don’t just clear obstacles - you create space for more nuanced, authentic expression.
The notion of experimenting with flow and deep work also sparks an intriguing thought: perhaps the real magic isn’t just in achieving flow but in learning from the resistance that precedes it. Every struggle, distraction, or mental block is a mirror reflecting where growth lies. Becoming aware of those moments allows us not just to write better but to understand ourselves more deeply as creators. Your approach inspires us to treat writing not just as output but as self-discovery, a process where the writer evolves alongside their words. Thanks again!
As a data-driven person myself, your story deeply resonated with me. I liked the qualitative nuances in your engaging and insightful story.