Trust and Psychological Safety? Sorry, That’s Not in the Budget

Decoding trust and interpersonal risk-taking

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

I stared at the email from our CFO that arrived that cold Monday, April 23, 2009 at 6:06 AM; the words swimming before my eyes.

“Budget constraints,” it read, “necessitate… adjustments.” Adjustments. That’s what they were calling it now. Adjustments to… everything.

And buried, almost as an afterthought, in a bullet point list, was the kicker: “Initiatives related to trust-building and psychological safety are postponed indefinitely, as they are not considered critical to immediate operational needs.”

Not critical? Not critical? My chest tightened, a familiar knot forming in my stomach. It felt like a punch, a cold, calculated blow to the very heart of what

I believed in, what I knew, as a in-house facilitator and a coach; deep down, was the very engine of any successful endeavor. We were talking about people here, weren’t we? Not machines, not spreadsheets, but human beings, with beating hearts and fragile minds.

And we were saying that their ability to trust each other, to feel safe enough to speak up, to be themselves – that wasn’t a priority right now. That wasn't in the budget.

It felt… wrong. Utterly, fundamentally wrong.

But I guess ‘wrong’ often gets trumped by ‘bottom line.’ And in that moment, staring at that sterile email, I realized we were headed down a path paved with good intentions, maybe, but destined for a destination I deeply feared. A destination where innovation dies, where creativity withers, and where, ultimately, the ‘bottom line’ itself suffers, albeit in ways they probably wouldn’t even track on their precious spreadsheets.

I knew I needed to articulate this feeling, this unease that gnawed at me. Not just for myself, but for the team, for the future. So, I decided to put pen to paper, or rather, fingers to keyboard, and unravel this tangled mess of priorities and misaligned values. Let’s talk about trust and psychological safety, what they truly are, why they’re not some fluffy, ‘nice-to-have’ corporate buzzwords, but fundamental human needs, and why saying they’re “not in the budget” is not just short-sighted, it’s downright dangerous.

What Are We Really Talking About? Decoding Trust and Psychological Safety

Let’s start with definitions. Because often, these terms get thrown around without a real grasp of their depth. And understanding is the first step to valuing.

Trust. It’s a word we use every day, but what does it really mean in a professional context? Think of it like this: trust is the bedrock of any meaningful relationship, personal or professional. It’s the firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something. It’s that quiet confidence you have when you know someone has your back, when you believe they will act with integrity, even when no one is watching. It’s about vulnerability. Trusting someone means making yourself vulnerable to them, knowing they could potentially let you down, but choosing to believe they won’t.

As Brené Brown puts it, “Trust is built in very small moments.” It’s not about grand gestures, but the consistent, everyday actions that signal to others, “You are safe with me. Your voice matters. Your well-being is important.”

Now, let’s layer in Psychological Safety. This is the climate in which people feel free to be themselves – to speak up with ideas, questions, concerns, and even mistakes – without fear of negative consequences, ridicule, or punishment. Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson, who pioneered the concept, defines it as "a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking."

Think about that for a moment. Interpersonal risk-taking. That’s powerful. It means feeling safe enough to be vulnerable at work. To ask ‘stupid’ questions, to challenge the status quo, to admit when you’re wrong, to offer a crazy, out-of-the-box idea, even when you’re not sure it will land. Psychological safety isn’t just about being ‘nice.’ It’s about creating an environment where intellectual honesty and courageous conversations are not just tolerated, but actively encouraged.

And here’s the crucial connection: Psychological safety is born from trust. You can't have one without the other. When we trust our colleagues and leaders, we feel psychologically safe. We believe they will treat us with respect, even if we stumble or disagree. This feeling of safety, in turn, fuels creativity, collaboration, and innovation. It unlocks our potential.

But when trust erodes, when psychological safety vanishes… well, that’s when the cracks start to appear. And those cracks, I fear, are precisely what we’re inviting by declaring trust and psychological safety ‘not in our budget.’

Fear vs. Flourishing

Let’s delve into the science for a moment, because this isn't just about fuzzy feelings. This is deeply rooted in our human psychology and how our brains are wired.

Our brains are fundamentally designed for survival. When we perceive a threat, our amygdala, the ancient part of our brain responsible for processing emotions, particularly fear, kicks into high gear. Our stress response system – the fight-or-flight response – activates, flooding our bodies with cortisol and adrenaline. This is fantastic if we’re facing a saber-toothed tiger.

Not so great when we're facing a tight deadline, a demanding boss, or, you know, a company culture that subtly (or not so subtly) signals that vulnerability is weakness and mistakes are punishable offenses.

When we operate in a low-trust, psychologically unsafe environment, our brains are constantly on high alert. We become hyper-vigilant, scanning for potential threats, real or perceived. This state of chronic stress has profound consequences:

• Cognitive Function Impairment: Stress hormones hijack our prefrontal cortex, the part of our brain responsible for higher-level thinking, creativity, and problem-solving. We become less innovative, less adaptable, and less effective at our jobs. We’re essentially working with a brain that's partially shut down, focused solely on survival, not thriving.

• Reduced Creativity and Innovation: Fear silences us. When we’re afraid of judgment or retribution, we’re far less likely to share ideas, especially those that are unconventional or risky. Innovation, by its very nature, requires experimentation, which inevitably involves mistakes and failures along the way. If mistakes are punished, experimentation ceases, and innovation withers on the vine.

• Diminished Collaboration and Communication: Trust is the social glue that binds teams together. Without it, communication breaks down. People become guarded, hesitant to share information, and reluctant to collaborate openly. Silos form, information becomes hoarded, and misunderstandings flourish. Teamwork becomes a hollow concept, replaced by individual survival instincts.

• Increased Burnout and Turnover: Working in a fear-based environment is emotionally and mentally exhausting. The constant stress, the lack of support, the feeling of being undervalued – it all takes a toll. Burnout rates skyrocket, and talented individuals, who have options, will inevitably seek out environments where they can flourish, not just survive. The organization ends up bleeding talent, losing the very people who could help them navigate those ‘budget constraints’ in the first place.

So, is it really a budget saving to cut initiatives that foster trust and psychological safety? Or is it a false economy, a penny-wise, pound-foolish decision that ultimately undermines the very foundations of a healthy and productive organization? The science, and frankly, common sense, screams the latter.

Cracks in the Foundation: The Tangible Cost of Neglect

Let’s get practical. What does a workplace devoid of trust and psychological safety actually look like? And more importantly, what are the real-world consequences?

I’ve seen it firsthand, in organizations that prioritize ‘results at all costs’ and view ‘soft skills’ like trust and empathy as expendable. It’s not a pretty picture. It’s a slow, insidious decay, like rust eating away at metal. The cracks appear subtly at first, then widen into gaping fissures.

Here’s what you start to see:

• Silence and Self-Censorship: Meetings become superficial performances. People nod along, agreeing with the loudest voice in the room, regardless of their true opinions. Dissenting viewpoints are suppressed, either overtly or through subtle social cues that signal ‘don’t rock the boat.’ Valuable insights and critical feedback are left unspoken, buried beneath a veneer of false harmony.

• Blame Culture and Finger-Pointing: When mistakes inevitably happen, as they always do in any complex endeavor, the focus immediately shifts to finding someone to blame. Instead of seeing errors as learning opportunities, they become occasions for punishment and public shaming. People become terrified of making mistakes, leading to risk aversion and a culture of CYA (Cover Your Ass).

• Siloed Departments and Internal Competition: Without trust, collaboration withers. Departments become isolated fiefdoms, hoarding resources and information, competing with each other rather than working together towards a shared goal. Internal politics and backstabbing replace genuine teamwork.

• Decreased Productivity and Efficiency: All this fear and internal friction takes a heavy toll on productivity. Time and energy are wasted on navigating political minefields, managing anxiety, and recovering from burnout. Errors increase due to lack of open communication and collaboration. Deadlines are missed, quality suffers, and the overall efficiency of the organization plummets.

• Erosion of Morale and Engagement: Working in a low-trust, psychologically unsafe environment is soul-crushing. People feel undervalued, unheard, and disrespected. Morale plummets, engagement dwindles, and presenteeism replaces genuine commitment. People show up physically, but their hearts and minds are long gone.

These aren't just abstract concepts. These are real, tangible costs that directly impact the bottom line. Lost productivity, increased turnover, decreased innovation, damaged reputation – these all translate into financial losses, often far exceeding the ‘savings’ achieved by cutting those ‘non-critical’ trust-building initiatives.

The Bottom Line: It’s Not Just About the Money, But It Is About the Money

Here’s the ironic truth: prioritizing trust and psychological safety isn’t just the right thing to do from a human perspective, it’s also the smart thing to do from a business perspective. It’s not just about being ‘nice,’ it’s about being effective.

Think about it: what kind of organization do you want to be? One that ekes out a bare existence through command-and-control tactics, squeezing every ounce of effort out of fearful employees? Or one that thrives, innovates, and adapts, fueled by the collective intelligence, creativity, and passion of a highly engaged and trusting workforce?

The former might appear cheaper in the short term. You cut those ‘fluffy’ programs, you tighten the screws, you focus solely on immediate outputs. But in the long run, it’s a recipe for disaster. You’ll bleed talent, stifle innovation, and ultimately, undermine your own sustainability.

The latter, the organization that invests in trust and psychological safety, understands that these are not costs, but investments. Investments in human capital, in organizational resilience, and in long-term success. They understand that a workforce that feels safe, valued, and trusted is a workforce that is more productive, more creative, more resilient, and more loyal.

And yes, there are costs associated with building trust and psychological safety. It takes time, effort, and resources. It might involve training programs, leadership development, and culture change initiatives. But these are not expenses, they are strategic investments that yield significant returns.

In fact, I would argue that trust and psychological safety are not just in the budget, they are the budget. They are the very foundation upon which any successful organization is built. Without them, everything else – the strategies, the technologies, the processes – becomes less effective, less sustainable, and ultimately, less profitable.

Is This Really the Budget We Want? A Call to Reconsider

So, here we are. Staring at that email, at that seemingly innocuous phrase, “not in our budget.” But I see it for what it truly is: a profound miscalculation, a short-sighted decision based on a fundamentally flawed understanding of what drives real, sustainable success.

We are not just budgeting dollars and cents here. We are budgeting for our future. We are deciding what kind of organization we want to be, what kind of culture we want to cultivate, and what kind of results we want to achieve.

And if we choose to cut trust and psychological safety from that budget, we are not just saving money. We are cutting corners on our own potential. We are sacrificing innovation for short-term gains. We are jeopardizing the very foundation of our long-term success.

It’s time to re-evaluate our priorities. It’s time to challenge the narrow, spreadsheet-driven view of ‘budget’ that ignores the human element, the emotional landscape, the very essence of what makes us effective, creative, and resilient as human beings.

Is this really the budget we want? A budget that prioritizes immediate, measurable outputs over the intangible, yet infinitely more valuable, foundations of trust and psychological safety? A budget that saves pennies today, but risks losing thousands tomorrow?

I believe we can do better. I believe we must do better. Because in the long run, the true cost of neglecting trust and psychological safety is far greater than anything we could ever ‘save’ on a spreadsheet. It’s the cost of lost potential, of stifled innovation, and ultimately, of a future that is far less bright than it could be.

Let’s put trust and psychological safety back on the budget. Not as an optional extra, but as a non-negotiable foundation. Because in the end, it’s not just about the bottom line. It’s about building a workplace where people can thrive, where innovation flourishes, and where we can all, together, achieve something truly meaningful. And that, I truly believe, is priceless.

---

👉 If you enjoy reading this post, feel free to share it with friends! Or feel free to click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Substack